<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Retro Review: The Way of the Warrior</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.trektoday.com/content/2013/02/retro-review-the-way-of-the-warrior/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.trektoday.com/content/2013/02/retro-review-the-way-of-the-warrior/</link>
	<description>Daily Star Trek news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 00:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Polaris01313-1</title>
		<link>http://www.trektoday.com/content/2013/02/retro-review-the-way-of-the-warrior/comment-page-1/#comment-12572</link>
		<dc:creator>Polaris01313-1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trektoday.com/content/?p=23180#comment-12572</guid>
		<description>If you mean there is no point in having a discussion with you, then you are quite right. To be perfectly honest, you and this confusing, inexplicable, atypical, and illogical purist behavior has bored the living hell out of me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you mean there is no point in having a discussion with you, then you are quite right. To be perfectly honest, you and this confusing, inexplicable, atypical, and illogical purist behavior has bored the living hell out of me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.trektoday.com/content/2013/02/retro-review-the-way-of-the-warrior/comment-page-1/#comment-12566</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trektoday.com/content/?p=23180#comment-12566</guid>
		<description>Nope, but a conversation has to be between at least two people... and you aren&#039;t remotely responding to what is actually being said... so, there&#039;s no point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope, but a conversation has to be between at least two people&#8230; and you aren&#8217;t remotely responding to what is actually being said&#8230; so, there&#8217;s no point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Polaris01313-1</title>
		<link>http://www.trektoday.com/content/2013/02/retro-review-the-way-of-the-warrior/comment-page-1/#comment-12554</link>
		<dc:creator>Polaris01313-1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 04:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trektoday.com/content/?p=23180#comment-12554</guid>
		<description>I have no interest, let alone do not concern myself, in the reviewing of how many votes are up and down in this thread. That is the business and decision of others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no interest, let alone do not concern myself, in the reviewing of how many votes are up and down in this thread. That is the business and decision of others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Polaris01313-1</title>
		<link>http://www.trektoday.com/content/2013/02/retro-review-the-way-of-the-warrior/comment-page-1/#comment-12551</link>
		<dc:creator>Polaris01313-1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 04:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trektoday.com/content/?p=23180#comment-12551</guid>
		<description>Another fine example of arrogance and close-minded behavior. 

I can see where the term &#039;fan&#039; can be often described a short for fanatic. In this case, it&#039;s purist fanaticism!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another fine example of arrogance and close-minded behavior. </p>
<p>I can see where the term &#8216;fan&#8217; can be often described a short for fanatic. In this case, it&#8217;s purist fanaticism!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.trektoday.com/content/2013/02/retro-review-the-way-of-the-warrior/comment-page-1/#comment-12545</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2013 16:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trektoday.com/content/?p=23180#comment-12545</guid>
		<description>You can&#039;t choose anything if you can&#039;t understand simple English. I&#039;m out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can&#8217;t choose anything if you can&#8217;t understand simple English. I&#8217;m out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Polaris01313-1</title>
		<link>http://www.trektoday.com/content/2013/02/retro-review-the-way-of-the-warrior/comment-page-1/#comment-12521</link>
		<dc:creator>Polaris01313-1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2013 03:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trektoday.com/content/?p=23180#comment-12521</guid>
		<description>I would hardly call liking Kirk and his crew only as being delusional. I would call it as having the freedom to choose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would hardly call liking Kirk and his crew only as being delusional. I would call it as having the freedom to choose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.trektoday.com/content/2013/02/retro-review-the-way-of-the-warrior/comment-page-1/#comment-12506</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trektoday.com/content/?p=23180#comment-12506</guid>
		<description>No, the delusional part is to only really like Kirk and crew, while bashing as derivative hacks everyone else that ever did Star Trek, and then claiming the people that like the vast majority of all Trek are the ones being the purists... I don&#039;t get what&#039;s so hard to understand here... It&#039;s been in English.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, the delusional part is to only really like Kirk and crew, while bashing as derivative hacks everyone else that ever did Star Trek, and then claiming the people that like the vast majority of all Trek are the ones being the purists&#8230; I don&#8217;t get what&#8217;s so hard to understand here&#8230; It&#8217;s been in English.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.trektoday.com/content/2013/02/retro-review-the-way-of-the-warrior/comment-page-1/#comment-12503</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 16:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trektoday.com/content/?p=23180#comment-12503</guid>
		<description>If you think my responses are symptomatic of autism, feel free to say it. I won&#039;t get bent out of shape or PRETEND to be offended by it.

The question wasn&#039;t about my behavior, mind you, it was about yours and your and SJStar&#039;s reaction to a harmless, tongue-in-cheek observation that&#039;s not inaccurate. Nowhere did I say I was the paragon of adult behavior... but, and I&#039;m just guessing now, I&#039;d say that your tantrums (all about the same thing) and attitude generally are seen by far more people as egregious than my comments... Don&#039;t think so? Review how many up votes and down votes each of us have gotten in this thread... Not scientific, but certainly indicative of passion and sentiment...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you think my responses are symptomatic of autism, feel free to say it. I won&#8217;t get bent out of shape or PRETEND to be offended by it.</p>
<p>The question wasn&#8217;t about my behavior, mind you, it was about yours and your and SJStar&#8217;s reaction to a harmless, tongue-in-cheek observation that&#8217;s not inaccurate. Nowhere did I say I was the paragon of adult behavior&#8230; but, and I&#8217;m just guessing now, I&#8217;d say that your tantrums (all about the same thing) and attitude generally are seen by far more people as egregious than my comments&#8230; Don&#8217;t think so? Review how many up votes and down votes each of us have gotten in this thread&#8230; Not scientific, but certainly indicative of passion and sentiment&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Polaris01313-1</title>
		<link>http://www.trektoday.com/content/2013/02/retro-review-the-way-of-the-warrior/comment-page-1/#comment-12491</link>
		<dc:creator>Polaris01313-1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 04:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trektoday.com/content/?p=23180#comment-12491</guid>
		<description>And I suppose that the various other postings/responses(colorful as they have been)to those that differ with yours and others have been the acts of a properly socialized adult? That&#039;s just about calling the kettle black.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I suppose that the various other postings/responses(colorful as they have been)to those that differ with yours and others have been the acts of a properly socialized adult? That&#8217;s just about calling the kettle black.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Polaris01313-1</title>
		<link>http://www.trektoday.com/content/2013/02/retro-review-the-way-of-the-warrior/comment-page-1/#comment-12488</link>
		<dc:creator>Polaris01313-1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 04:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trektoday.com/content/?p=23180#comment-12488</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m afraid I am not entirely familiar with that storyline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m afraid I am not entirely familiar with that storyline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
