<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Retro Review: Shakaar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.trektoday.com/content/2013/01/retro-review-shakaar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.trektoday.com/content/2013/01/retro-review-shakaar/</link>
	<description>Daily Star Trek news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 19:02:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enterprise1981</title>
		<link>http://www.trektoday.com/content/2013/01/retro-review-shakaar/comment-page-1/#comment-11783</link>
		<dc:creator>Enterprise1981</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 20:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trektoday.com/content/?p=22661#comment-11783</guid>
		<description>The &quot;predictable shit&quot; I see is commenters like onias making shit up to be pissed off about. Move along, son.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;predictable shit&#8221; I see is commenters like onias making shit up to be pissed off about. Move along, son.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.trektoday.com/content/2013/01/retro-review-shakaar/comment-page-1/#comment-11729</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trektoday.com/content/?p=22661#comment-11729</guid>
		<description>I take exception when she removes elements from their contexts and suggests they represent something else. That isn&#039;t the case here, so, the only one really going out of their way to be annoying about the same ole subject is you, chum. This episode was about what she reviewed. I don&#039;t begrudge her that. Ignoring what is there is just as bad as inventing that which is not... I&#039;m all for taking it to her when I think she&#039;s wrong or out of line, but in this case, she&#039;s not... How would you have reviewed this episode without talking about Shakaar or Kira?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I take exception when she removes elements from their contexts and suggests they represent something else. That isn&#8217;t the case here, so, the only one really going out of their way to be annoying about the same ole subject is you, chum. This episode was about what she reviewed. I don&#8217;t begrudge her that. Ignoring what is there is just as bad as inventing that which is not&#8230; I&#8217;m all for taking it to her when I think she&#8217;s wrong or out of line, but in this case, she&#8217;s not&#8230; How would you have reviewed this episode without talking about Shakaar or Kira?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: onias</title>
		<link>http://www.trektoday.com/content/2013/01/retro-review-shakaar/comment-page-1/#comment-11726</link>
		<dc:creator>onias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 15:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trektoday.com/content/?p=22661#comment-11726</guid>
		<description>Michelle would like this shit, for two reasons, she&#039;s creamin&#039; over shaakar, and her whole empowered woman takes on the world kira. sick of this predictable shit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michelle would like this shit, for two reasons, she&#8217;s creamin&#8217; over shaakar, and her whole empowered woman takes on the world kira. sick of this predictable shit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
