Comments on: Burk: Star Trek Into Darkness To A Darker Place

By: Markac

Markac — Thu, 17 Jan 2013 09:00:00 +0000

I thought we were supposed to return to “Prime Universe” after a maximum of three of these movies? I certainly hope so anyway…

By: Milojthatch

Milojthatch — Wed, 16 Jan 2013 04:44:00 +0000

I miss Prime Universe Star Trek. *sigh*

By: Kang the Unbalanced

Kang the Unbalanced — Thu, 10 Jan 2013 15:39:00 +0000

Best explanation since Holly explained why you can’t see black holes in space.

By: Guest

Guest — Wed, 09 Jan 2013 05:49:00 +0000

He didn’t want to leave anyone thinking that there’d be fewer lens flares. The key demographics gobble up lens flares. You see, their bright light indicates a bright future. It’s not that the future is actually brighter with lights, but rather that it’s a future that is bright in all sorts of metaphorical ways, though it does also have both lights and lenses that, in combination, can produce lens flares as well.

By: Mike

Mike — Wed, 09 Jan 2013 05:14:00 +0000

When “dark” was raised, did anyone, at all, ever, once, possibly think they actually meant less illumination in the cinematography? What is this guy talking about? Does he think we’re stupid and that we didn’t get that the “darkness” referred to the tone? That really needs spelled out? WTF has ST come to?

By: J.J. Abrams

J.J. Abrams — Wed, 09 Jan 2013 02:51:00 +0000

DARK AND GRITTY DARK AND GRITTY DARK AND GRITTY

:explosion:

:Inception horn:

:lens flare:

By: Daniel Ireland

Daniel Ireland — Wed, 09 Jan 2013 01:42:00 +0000

“There was something interesting about that as a jumping off point,”

Ohhh so that’s why there is so much jumping in the trailer. Jumping off cliffs, through windows, on top of Klingons, etc.

Also, I love that he compared it to Star Wars. Haha!