Comments on: No Star Wars For Abrams

By: BlueThunder

BlueThunder — Tue, 27 Nov 2012 01:49:00 +0000

And once again, audiences are given a glimpse of what is wrong with Star Trek fandom and the futility of feuding fan organizations.

By: nevilleross

nevilleross — Sat, 17 Nov 2012 15:59:00 +0000

I did, unlike you.

By: Polaris01313-1

Polaris01313-1 — Fri, 16 Nov 2012 22:13:00 +0000

J.J. Abrams isn’t mishandling the franchise. If anything, helped bring life back to it.

If anybody is reducing the Roddenberry vision of Star Trek to such lower levels, you need not look any further than Farragut Films. That’s where the real blame lies.

It does NOT lie with Abrams and his staff.

By: Typhon

Typhon — Fri, 16 Nov 2012 12:19:00 +0000

Did you read the article or are you an f’ing nimrod?

By: trekfan

trekfan — Fri, 16 Nov 2012 11:37:00 +0000

If someone is mishandling the franchise, then it’s J.J. Abrams. Or, shall I say, Jar Jar Abrams? It’s extremely disrespectful to reduce the Roddenberry’s visionary Trek to to such a cheap, forgettable, mindless, average Hollywood piece of trash as Abrams did. It’s a real shame, and the day he came to work on Star Trek is the day of infamy. And, just as there’s this saying that the greatest trick the devil ever pulled was to make the world believe he wasn’t there, so, too, Abrams made the world believe he brought Star Trek to life, despite the opposite being true.

By: nevilleross

nevilleross — Fri, 16 Nov 2012 05:19:00 +0000

Except, that he hasn’t done so.

By: nevilleross

nevilleross — Fri, 16 Nov 2012 05:18:00 +0000

And you know this…how?

By: Polaris01313-1

Polaris01313-1 — Fri, 16 Nov 2012 02:01:00 +0000

I don’t know about that.

What I described was the foolish emotions of those at Farragut Films(apparently, they have no comprehension of the English language, whatsoever)and their two useless spin-offs, Starship Farragut and Star Trek Continues, The latter show being Vic Mignogna’s personal vendetta and petty spitefulness against the hardworking professionals on Star Trek-New Voyages/Phase II.

The aforementioned links provide such an accurate description of Farragut Films’ inexplicable, atypical, and illogical behavior.

http://trekmovie.com/2012/03/26/new-star-trek-fan-film-to-feature-chris-doohan-as-scotty-and-mythbusters-imahara-as-sulu/#comment-4656857
http://www.trekbbs.com/showthread.php?p=6187033#post6187033

http://www.trekbbs.com/showthread.php?t=169732

http://www.facebook.com/startrekphase2/posts/10150828754860934

http://trekbbs.com/showthread.php?p=5440252#post5440252 —

Dennis Bailey once described a certain Star Trek organization as a ‘gated community of the damned, with segregatiionist tendencies’.

Given this independent film company’s actions, and those commited by their corrupt and unethical business partner, that snide description of his certainly fits Farragut Films like a raggedly-worn glove.

What J.J. Abrams and his staff have done is the exact opposite of this negativity. They brought life back to Star Trek, when it had been wrung dry due to Rick Berman’s mishandling and mismanagement of the franchise.

By: trekfan

trekfan — Thu, 15 Nov 2012 17:04:00 +0000

Polaris, you’ve just described Abrams’ vision of Star Trek.

By: Polaris 01313-1

Polaris 01313-1 — Thu, 15 Nov 2012 05:24:00 +0000

The only time I ever look in the mirror is to shave and brush my teeth. But that is neither here nor there.

Honestly, the only thing I have asked, Dennis, is why people like you and the others I’ve mentioned have a nasty habit of ruining something as cool as Star Trek by perverting it into a fetid and festering sewer, a pigmire, and a snobbish social club with such bad manners, rude behavior, flagrant disrespect for others, high school clique-like mentalities, petty vindictiveness, and other disgusting, distasteful, inept, fatous, inane, poisonous, and illogical qualities.

Welcome to the 21st Century and the shambolic state of humanity.

At the rate of progression that mankind is going, there is no way that Roddenberry’s vision of the 23rd Century will ever happen.