Comments on: Neil Armstrong’s Star Trek Wish

By: Polaris01313-1

Polaris01313-1 — Sun, 18 Nov 2012 00:22:00 +0000

More like certain people at Farragut Films are threatened by honesty.

By: Polaris01313-1

Polaris01313-1 — Sat, 17 Nov 2012 05:05:00 +0000

I seem to recall that you have no great love for Farragut Films and its staff, either. Talk about throwing stones in a glass house.

By: bydefault

bydefault — Wed, 14 Nov 2012 06:27:00 +0000

Hush now, don’t feed the troll. Polly wanna cracker?

By: j

Tue, 13 Nov 2012 22:14:00 +0000

You only remember the really good ones and the really bad ones

By: Kang the Unbalanced

Kang the Unbalanced — Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:32:00 +0000

Your hijacking of this thread has actually managed to offend me. Perhaps it is time to take your annoying vendetta somewhere else.

By: Horatius

Horatius — Sun, 11 Nov 2012 04:16:00 +0000

In 2004 I hadn’t been to a Trek convention in nearly 20 years. I was in California at the time and seriously thought of going to Mr. Doohan’s last. Was always a little sorry I didn’t.

Was thinking just the other day the uniform high level of craftmanship there was among TV character actors in 1960s Hollywood. A golden age, in a way. Lots of stage-quality folks putting their best into every role. A category which includes James Doohan. Thanks for the memories, and RIP.

By: Polaris01313-1

Polaris01313-1 — Sat, 10 Nov 2012 08:27:00 +0000

While it would it have been cool to have seen Neil Armstrong play a character on Star Trek, I can understand and respect why he was unavailable at the time. I’ve always admired Mr. Armstrong for his notorious sense of privacy and wanting to stay out of the limelight. After achieving a goal such as the one he is most famous for, who wouldn’t want to continue to lead a private life?

While I appreciate the fact that the Star Trek – Renegades production is dedicating their film to the first man who walked on the moon, I think there is a better way for them to honor and respect one of the world’s greatest American heroes.

That being the following: firing Vic Mignogna and relieving him of his duties from what is bound to be a dud(i.e. flop)of a Star Trek fan film. Already Mignogna has tarnished the reputation of Starship Farragut and Farragut Films by some very controversial and unethical acts(it’s amazing how foolish John Broughton, Michael Bednar, Dennis Bailey, and the rest of that film company’s were in bringing him on as a business partner – talk about poor business decisions and handling). Already, he is poisoning the Star Trek fan film realm with his bastardization, farce, Phase 2 rip-off Star Trek Continues(a fan film he is doing out of some petty vengeance and personal spite against James Cawley and the hard working professionals on the Phase 2 production). Now he is going to poison and taint another portion of it(one that is already controversial for other semi-related issues)..

What’s next for him to poison? The entire Star Trek franchise, itself?

It sure seems to look that way, doesn’t it?

http://trekmovie.com/2012/03/26/new-star-trek-fan-film-to-feature-chris-doohan-as-scotty-and-mythbusters-imahara-as-sulu/#comment-4656857

http://www.trekbbs.com/showthread.php?p=6187033#post6187033

http://www.trekbbs.com/showthread.php?t=169732

http://www.facebook.com/startrekphase2/posts/10150828754860934

http://trekbbs.com/showthread.php?p=5440252#post5440252

To even dedicate this production that Mignogna is associated with would be a huge offense to the memory of Neil Armstrong and the contributions he made to science and technology.

It’s amazing that whatever career this toxic narcicist has hasn’t ended because of his actions, be they past and present.

Will Rogers once said “I never met a man that I didn’t like.”

Obviously, he never met Vic Mignogna and his not-so-clear thinking minions.