<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TV Alert: Revolution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.trektoday.com/content/2012/09/tv-alert-revolution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.trektoday.com/content/2012/09/tv-alert-revolution/</link>
	<description>Daily Star Trek news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 00:45:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://www.trektoday.com/content/2012/09/tv-alert-revolution/comment-page-1/#comment-8714</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 22:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trektoday.com/content/?p=20069#comment-8714</guid>
		<description>A good flashback can move the story forward. About the guns, it&#039;s hard to make machine guns without electricity. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good flashback can move the story forward. About the guns, it&#8217;s hard to make machine guns without electricity. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Rose</title>
		<link>http://www.trektoday.com/content/2012/09/tv-alert-revolution/comment-page-1/#comment-8711</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 22:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trektoday.com/content/?p=20069#comment-8711</guid>
		<description>the mysterious part is, why doesn&#039;t it turn back on in FIFTEEN YEARS. You try and make a generator? Doesn&#039;t work. An EMP doesn&#039;t do that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the mysterious part is, why doesn&#8217;t it turn back on in FIFTEEN YEARS. You try and make a generator? Doesn&#8217;t work. An EMP doesn&#8217;t do that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JWPlatt</title>
		<link>http://www.trektoday.com/content/2012/09/tv-alert-revolution/comment-page-1/#comment-8696</link>
		<dc:creator>JWPlatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 06:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trektoday.com/content/?p=20069#comment-8696</guid>
		<description>Hellooo!?
  Founder changling women?   Picard?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hellooo!?<br />
  Founder changling women?   Picard?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kang the Unbalanced</title>
		<link>http://www.trektoday.com/content/2012/09/tv-alert-revolution/comment-page-1/#comment-8684</link>
		<dc:creator>Kang the Unbalanced</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 14:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trektoday.com/content/?p=20069#comment-8684</guid>
		<description>In the future, boobs will not sag and hairlines will not recede. If Star Trek has taught me anything, it has taught me this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the future, boobs will not sag and hairlines will not recede. If Star Trek has taught me anything, it has taught me this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kang the Unbalanced</title>
		<link>http://www.trektoday.com/content/2012/09/tv-alert-revolution/comment-page-1/#comment-8618</link>
		<dc:creator>Kang the Unbalanced</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 15:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trektoday.com/content/?p=20069#comment-8618</guid>
		<description>By and large I enjoy the articles you post. If I don&#039;t find them interesting, then I move on to the next article. Funny how that works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By and large I enjoy the articles you post. If I don&#8217;t find them interesting, then I move on to the next article. Funny how that works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TBonz</title>
		<link>http://www.trektoday.com/content/2012/09/tv-alert-revolution/comment-page-1/#comment-8603</link>
		<dc:creator>TBonz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 05:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trektoday.com/content/?p=20069#comment-8603</guid>
		<description>I post news Monday through Friday. Obviously, my personal preference is for directly-related-to-Trek news, but that&#039;s not always possible. So I will talk about other projects of those who have been involved in Trek, such as Abrams&#039; new series, or Takei&#039;s new play.

With the only Trek production being finished (and under tremendous secrecy all during filming), there&#039;s not a lot of Trek news out there and only so much merchandise is being released.

I&#039;m hopeful that the stories I post are interesting to people and I do my best to post an interesting variety. Given human nature and individual tastes, it&#039;s only natural that some won&#039;t like some stories and others won&#039;t like different stories. I&#039;d rather post too many stories than not enough, and as I said, I need to have something up M-F.

I only posted the Saldana statement given the long-term nature of her engagement (that was broken). I&#039;ve not (nor do I intend to post) posted on her romance with, uh, what&#039;s his name - Bradley Cooper, I think, that was a very short-term &quot;working on the same movie&quot; romance, nor have I posted about Zach Quinto&#039;s relationship with the fellow from Glee, even though I wish them every happiness. I will post on marriages, sometimes the birth of children and deaths. I may occasionally post on relationships, but I have to feel there is a good reason to do so. 

You have the option of not reading stuff that doesn&#039;t interest you. When I was just a reader of the news, that&#039;s what I did. Story that wasn&#039;t to my taste? SKIP. Didn&#039;t click. It&#039;s what I do at any news site - I read that which interests me.

And yes, &quot;God forbid I not post something.&quot; Do you want me to be like another Trek site, which won&#039;t post for a few weeks, then will post for a day or two like crazy (and half of that fan productions or stupid fan YouTube mashups or whatever?) 

The news is free here. Read it or don&#039;t. I&#039;m trying to do my best to bring interesting articles, but unlike Scotty - I&#039;m not a miracle worker. I can&#039;t make up news. If it&#039;s thin on the ground, I have to do my 
best. And - even if there are six articles in a day, there is still no 
guarantee that someone will be interested/like an article. That&#039;s how it
 goes.

Kind of boggles my mind that someone bitches about something that is provided for free. LOL. That&#039;s the Internet for you.

To those that enjoy the articles, thank you. I sincerely try to put up interesting stuff that you will enjoy to read. To those that don&#039;t - well, again that&#039;s how it goes. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I post news Monday through Friday. Obviously, my personal preference is for directly-related-to-Trek news, but that&#8217;s not always possible. So I will talk about other projects of those who have been involved in Trek, such as Abrams&#8217; new series, or Takei&#8217;s new play.</p>
<p>With the only Trek production being finished (and under tremendous secrecy all during filming), there&#8217;s not a lot of Trek news out there and only so much merchandise is being released.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m hopeful that the stories I post are interesting to people and I do my best to post an interesting variety. Given human nature and individual tastes, it&#8217;s only natural that some won&#8217;t like some stories and others won&#8217;t like different stories. I&#8217;d rather post too many stories than not enough, and as I said, I need to have something up M-F.</p>
<p>I only posted the Saldana statement given the long-term nature of her engagement (that was broken). I&#8217;ve not (nor do I intend to post) posted on her romance with, uh, what&#8217;s his name &#8211; Bradley Cooper, I think, that was a very short-term &#8220;working on the same movie&#8221; romance, nor have I posted about Zach Quinto&#8217;s relationship with the fellow from Glee, even though I wish them every happiness. I will post on marriages, sometimes the birth of children and deaths. I may occasionally post on relationships, but I have to feel there is a good reason to do so. </p>
<p>You have the option of not reading stuff that doesn&#8217;t interest you. When I was just a reader of the news, that&#8217;s what I did. Story that wasn&#8217;t to my taste? SKIP. Didn&#8217;t click. It&#8217;s what I do at any news site &#8211; I read that which interests me.</p>
<p>And yes, &#8220;God forbid I not post something.&#8221; Do you want me to be like another Trek site, which won&#8217;t post for a few weeks, then will post for a day or two like crazy (and half of that fan productions or stupid fan YouTube mashups or whatever?) </p>
<p>The news is free here. Read it or don&#8217;t. I&#8217;m trying to do my best to bring interesting articles, but unlike Scotty &#8211; I&#8217;m not a miracle worker. I can&#8217;t make up news. If it&#8217;s thin on the ground, I have to do my<br />
best. And &#8211; even if there are six articles in a day, there is still no<br />
guarantee that someone will be interested/like an article. That&#8217;s how it<br />
 goes.</p>
<p>Kind of boggles my mind that someone bitches about something that is provided for free. LOL. That&#8217;s the Internet for you.</p>
<p>To those that enjoy the articles, thank you. I sincerely try to put up interesting stuff that you will enjoy to read. To those that don&#8217;t &#8211; well, again that&#8217;s how it goes. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kang the Unbalanced</title>
		<link>http://www.trektoday.com/content/2012/09/tv-alert-revolution/comment-page-1/#comment-8597</link>
		<dc:creator>Kang the Unbalanced</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 14:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trektoday.com/content/?p=20069#comment-8597</guid>
		<description>A strong EMP would have long-lasting effects. It will fry electronics and electrical components, even simple things like batteries if it&#039;s strong enough. It will also scramble the ionosphere for years or even decades.
However, that&#039;s not good enough for JJ, and so we throw in the red matter, the gizmo-that-makes-things-work-again, which is another middle finger in the face of established science.
Oh gods. Those knuckleheads wrote it, didn&#039;t they.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A strong EMP would have long-lasting effects. It will fry electronics and electrical components, even simple things like batteries if it&#8217;s strong enough. It will also scramble the ionosphere for years or even decades.<br />
However, that&#8217;s not good enough for JJ, and so we throw in the red matter, the gizmo-that-makes-things-work-again, which is another middle finger in the face of established science.<br />
Oh gods. Those knuckleheads wrote it, didn&#8217;t they.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seventhbeacon</title>
		<link>http://www.trektoday.com/content/2012/09/tv-alert-revolution/comment-page-1/#comment-8594</link>
		<dc:creator>seventhbeacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 05:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trektoday.com/content/?p=20069#comment-8594</guid>
		<description>I really liked this show when it was James Cameron&#039;s Dark Angel ;).  At least for the first year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really liked this show when it was James Cameron&#8217;s Dark Angel <img src='http://www.trektoday.com/content/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> .  At least for the first year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://www.trektoday.com/content/2012/09/tv-alert-revolution/comment-page-1/#comment-8582</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 01:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trektoday.com/content/?p=20069#comment-8582</guid>
		<description>I checked out the show. The production values were high, with impressive views of disused buildings and aircraft covered with foliage and so on. But one character turns out to be the most deadly butt-kicker ever, defeating 20 guys with behind-the-back sword moves and dodging gunfire and the like, and I didn&#039;t buy it for a second. 


Giancarlo Esposito made for a suitably menacing bad guy, but the whole &quot;militias&quot; thing seems odd; if guns still work, why are they so quickly reduced to (apparently newly manufactured) bladed weapons and flintlocks? Only some of the big-deal bad guys seem to have fancy modern guns. The &quot;computer geek&quot; character offers no surprises.


I&#039;m also annoyed how some of the characters look exactly the same after fifteen years. And as of now, it appears that Elizabeth Mitchell will only appear in flashbacks; that doesn&#039;t seem like the best idea on the face of it (not that I personally would want to see more of her, but rather it&#039;s a lot of money spent for something with limited ability to impact the story in the &quot;present&quot;).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I checked out the show. The production values were high, with impressive views of disused buildings and aircraft covered with foliage and so on. But one character turns out to be the most deadly butt-kicker ever, defeating 20 guys with behind-the-back sword moves and dodging gunfire and the like, and I didn&#8217;t buy it for a second. </p>
<p>Giancarlo Esposito made for a suitably menacing bad guy, but the whole &#8220;militias&#8221; thing seems odd; if guns still work, why are they so quickly reduced to (apparently newly manufactured) bladed weapons and flintlocks? Only some of the big-deal bad guys seem to have fancy modern guns. The &#8220;computer geek&#8221; character offers no surprises.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also annoyed how some of the characters look exactly the same after fifteen years. And as of now, it appears that Elizabeth Mitchell will only appear in flashbacks; that doesn&#8217;t seem like the best idea on the face of it (not that I personally would want to see more of her, but rather it&#8217;s a lot of money spent for something with limited ability to impact the story in the &#8220;present&#8221;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://www.trektoday.com/content/2012/09/tv-alert-revolution/comment-page-1/#comment-8579</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 01:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trektoday.com/content/?p=20069#comment-8579</guid>
		<description>There is a device some characters carry which locally inhibits the ongoing effect and makes technology work again, so there&#039;s a conspiracy angle and so on rather than just an EMP with one-time effects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a device some characters carry which locally inhibits the ongoing effect and makes technology work again, so there&#8217;s a conspiracy angle and so on rather than just an EMP with one-time effects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
