<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Star Trek In Paramount 100 Years Poster</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.trektoday.com/content/2012/06/star-trek-in-paramount-100-years-poster/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.trektoday.com/content/2012/06/star-trek-in-paramount-100-years-poster/</link>
	<description>Daily Star Trek news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 12:42:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: towergrove</title>
		<link>http://www.trektoday.com/content/2012/06/star-trek-in-paramount-100-years-poster/comment-page-1/#comment-5848</link>
		<dc:creator>towergrove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2012 12:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trektoday.com/content/?p=17962#comment-5848</guid>
		<description>OR you could just purchase the DVD or BD.  Nothing is free and Hollywood is not a charity case.  Cheap and free streams?  Enjoy them while you can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OR you could just purchase the DVD or BD.  Nothing is free and Hollywood is not a charity case.  Cheap and free streams?  Enjoy them while you can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dgx825</title>
		<link>http://www.trektoday.com/content/2012/06/star-trek-in-paramount-100-years-poster/comment-page-1/#comment-5758</link>
		<dc:creator>Dgx825</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 18:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trektoday.com/content/?p=17962#comment-5758</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s is Stupid as hell! why would Paramount put one of the worst trek films on the poster. 2, 4, 6, even 8, would have been better choices. Shame</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s is Stupid as hell! why would Paramount put one of the worst trek films on the poster. 2, 4, 6, even 8, would have been better choices. Shame</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ensign Ahkinum</title>
		<link>http://www.trektoday.com/content/2012/06/star-trek-in-paramount-100-years-poster/comment-page-1/#comment-5590</link>
		<dc:creator>Ensign Ahkinum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 15:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trektoday.com/content/?p=17962#comment-5590</guid>
		<description>Maybe I will like them if they let me stream all their movies at Amazon.com or Netflix with my membership for free.  (But, why Paramount so greedy with paper prints? Do they think they are special?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I will like them if they let me stream all their movies at Amazon.com or Netflix with my membership for free.  (But, why Paramount so greedy with paper prints? Do they think they are special?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
