<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lindelof: When Trek 2 Production Will Wrap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.trektoday.com/content/2012/03/lindelof-when-trek-2-production-will-wrap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.trektoday.com/content/2012/03/lindelof-when-trek-2-production-will-wrap/</link>
	<description>Daily Star Trek news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 15:31:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: STFan1971</title>
		<link>http://www.trektoday.com/content/2012/03/lindelof-when-trek-2-production-will-wrap/comment-page-1/#comment-3322</link>
		<dc:creator>STFan1971</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 04:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trektoday.com/content/?p=15922#comment-3322</guid>
		<description>You know how it sucks when the number of one of your favorite sports figures gets re-assigned to some journeyman who no one ever heard of?  That&#039;s what this feels like.  However, TWOK fans gotta keep in mind that it&#039;s the 20-somethings  that are fueling the Trek revenue machine now, and they aren&#039;t offended by the title re-use.  Mostly because they are unaware of an original ST:2.  It&#039;s their money funding the films and potentially future TV franchises now.  Anyone else want a repeat of ST V: TFF due to a lack of studio committment?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know how it sucks when the number of one of your favorite sports figures gets re-assigned to some journeyman who no one ever heard of?  That&#8217;s what this feels like.  However, TWOK fans gotta keep in mind that it&#8217;s the 20-somethings  that are fueling the Trek revenue machine now, and they aren&#8217;t offended by the title re-use.  Mostly because they are unaware of an original ST:2.  It&#8217;s their money funding the films and potentially future TV franchises now.  Anyone else want a repeat of ST V: TFF due to a lack of studio committment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hostile_17</title>
		<link>http://www.trektoday.com/content/2012/03/lindelof-when-trek-2-production-will-wrap/comment-page-1/#comment-3316</link>
		<dc:creator>hostile_17</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 17:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trektoday.com/content/?p=15922#comment-3316</guid>
		<description>To you. Not to everone else though. So adapt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To you. Not to everone else though. So adapt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 47</title>
		<link>http://www.trektoday.com/content/2012/03/lindelof-when-trek-2-production-will-wrap/comment-page-1/#comment-3313</link>
		<dc:creator>47</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 16:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trektoday.com/content/?p=15922#comment-3313</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s simply the 12th movie with the name &quot;Star Trek&quot; somewhere in there, so to me it&#039;s &quot;Star Trek 12&quot;.

Although it might also be &quot;Star Trek AE/BOS/AN 2&quot;...

*AE/BOS/AN meaning &quot;After Enterprise/Before Original Series/After Nemesis&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s simply the 12th movie with the name &#8220;Star Trek&#8221; somewhere in there, so to me it&#8217;s &#8220;Star Trek 12&#8243;.</p>
<p>Although it might also be &#8220;Star Trek AE/BOS/AN 2&#8243;&#8230;</p>
<p>*AE/BOS/AN meaning &#8220;After Enterprise/Before Original Series/After Nemesis&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hostile_17</title>
		<link>http://www.trektoday.com/content/2012/03/lindelof-when-trek-2-production-will-wrap/comment-page-1/#comment-3304</link>
		<dc:creator>hostile_17</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 07:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trektoday.com/content/?p=15922#comment-3304</guid>
		<description>But it&#039;s NOT a series.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But it&#8217;s NOT a series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Razorburn</title>
		<link>http://www.trektoday.com/content/2012/03/lindelof-when-trek-2-production-will-wrap/comment-page-1/#comment-3298</link>
		<dc:creator>Razorburn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 04:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trektoday.com/content/?p=15922#comment-3298</guid>
		<description>For the sake of argument, the film is the twelfth in the series(technically number two in the altered timeline). 

If anybody needs any fruits, vegetables, and in this case shit thrown at them, it&#039;s the Starship Farragut production. Being that those people couldn&#039;t tell the truth to save their declining production, be dishonest in their dealings, and hijacking other fan productions sets, they would deserve it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the sake of argument, the film is the twelfth in the series(technically number two in the altered timeline). </p>
<p>If anybody needs any fruits, vegetables, and in this case shit thrown at them, it&#8217;s the Starship Farragut production. Being that those people couldn&#8217;t tell the truth to save their declining production, be dishonest in their dealings, and hijacking other fan productions sets, they would deserve it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryce1084</title>
		<link>http://www.trektoday.com/content/2012/03/lindelof-when-trek-2-production-will-wrap/comment-page-1/#comment-3292</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryce1084</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 01:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trektoday.com/content/?p=15922#comment-3292</guid>
		<description>Ok i can&#039;t remember which site I was at but jj abrams star trek movies are 11 n 12 but for some odd reason first contact was listed as number one and eight of course the site I was at had a proper way to watch then entire franchise so yes first contact would be number one from James cromwells charchters point of view the you watch enterprise then tos then tng then at some point watch tng/ds9 then a movie of tng then ds9/voyager </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok i can&#8217;t remember which site I was at but jj abrams star trek movies are 11 n 12 but for some odd reason first contact was listed as number one and eight of course the site I was at had a proper way to watch then entire franchise so yes first contact would be number one from James cromwells charchters point of view the you watch enterprise then tos then tng then at some point watch tng/ds9 then a movie of tng then ds9/voyager </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hostile_17</title>
		<link>http://www.trektoday.com/content/2012/03/lindelof-when-trek-2-production-will-wrap/comment-page-1/#comment-3289</link>
		<dc:creator>hostile_17</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 21:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trektoday.com/content/?p=15922#comment-3289</guid>
		<description>Yah... that&#039;s why Star Trek: The Next Generation ended in season 1 part 7.

Or maybe considering people are getting hysterical that they can&#039;t delinate two separate Trek movie franchises we should just merge the TV shows together in the same way.

So TNG was season 4 to 11. DS9 was seasons... oh hell, that run at the same time. So do we have TNG AND DS9 seasons 10? Hmmm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yah&#8230; that&#8217;s why Star Trek: The Next Generation ended in season 1 part 7.</p>
<p>Or maybe considering people are getting hysterical that they can&#8217;t delinate two separate Trek movie franchises we should just merge the TV shows together in the same way.</p>
<p>So TNG was season 4 to 11. DS9 was seasons&#8230; oh hell, that run at the same time. So do we have TNG AND DS9 seasons 10? Hmmm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hostile_17</title>
		<link>http://www.trektoday.com/content/2012/03/lindelof-when-trek-2-production-will-wrap/comment-page-1/#comment-3283</link>
		<dc:creator>hostile_17</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 21:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trektoday.com/content/?p=15922#comment-3283</guid>
		<description>I was about to say epic sarcasm understanding fail... but you got there in the end. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was about to say epic sarcasm understanding fail&#8230; but you got there in the end. <img src='http://www.trektoday.com/content/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ensign Ahkinum</title>
		<link>http://www.trektoday.com/content/2012/03/lindelof-when-trek-2-production-will-wrap/comment-page-1/#comment-3286</link>
		<dc:creator>Ensign Ahkinum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 21:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trektoday.com/content/?p=15922#comment-3286</guid>
		<description>So, would that make it Star Trek 11 part 2
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, would that make it Star Trek 11 part 2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mredom</title>
		<link>http://www.trektoday.com/content/2012/03/lindelof-when-trek-2-production-will-wrap/comment-page-1/#comment-3277</link>
		<dc:creator>mredom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 21:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trektoday.com/content/?p=15922#comment-3277</guid>
		<description>Wait-Sorry Hostile_17, I see now you were highlighting the absurd by being absurd, as you posted already earlier in response to another guy who&#039;s clueless...

My apologies to you... it&#039;s the other guy doing his best Forrest Gump...

: )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait-Sorry Hostile_17, I see now you were highlighting the absurd by being absurd, as you posted already earlier in response to another guy who&#8217;s clueless&#8230;</p>
<p>My apologies to you&#8230; it&#8217;s the other guy doing his best Forrest Gump&#8230;</p>
<p>: )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
