Comments on: More Detail On Weller Star Trek 2 Role

By: Tj_elx

Tj_elx — Sat, 10 Dec 2011 03:37:00 +0000

Colonel Green was linked to the eugenics wars some how intertwined with the khan super humans concept in the original series. Peter weller played Paxton in the enterprise episode who was a follower of Col. Green. I wonder if Star Trek 2.0, peter weller will play a decedent of paxton to reprise the role which would link the khan concept of the new movie ?? Are they smart enough to do that in the new movie ?

By: Kang the Unbalanced

Kang the Unbalanced — Fri, 09 Dec 2011 15:20:00 +0000

YOUR MOVE… KHAN.

By: Kang the Unbalanced

Kang the Unbalanced — Fri, 09 Dec 2011 15:19:00 +0000

Good one! They never said which Archer.
Come to think of it, “Admiral Archer’s prize beagle” doesn’t even require him being alive, it may just mean the current champion of the bloodline.
(Ar maybe he was cyborged, or uploaded, or hell, freeze-dried or something.)

By: Cdbutler1204

Cdbutler1204 — Fri, 09 Dec 2011 12:36:00 +0000

I always thought the Archer mentioned might have been Archer’s son or grandson….who also loved Beagles.

By: Kang the Unbalanced

Kang the Unbalanced — Thu, 08 Dec 2011 15:51:00 +0000

Yes, it’s ridiculous.
Kurtzman and Orci didn’t see a problem with this because they have no concept of time OR space.

By: Kang the Unbalanced

Kang the Unbalanced — Thu, 08 Dec 2011 15:49:00 +0000

T’Pol is around and still working the granny-porn sites, I’m sure.
Please. Let Enterprise lie in its shallow grave. It did enough damage, we don’t need any more nods to the series that sodomized Trek into the ground.

By: Russell Haney

Russell Haney — Thu, 08 Dec 2011 05:58:00 +0000

If Admiral Archer is still around breading prize beagles then it is very possible Paxton is around as well. If they announce Archer is in the movie then we can be sure to see Paxton, of course T’pol could be around as well. Wasn’t there talk of a female vulcan or Romulan being in this new film?

By: Guest

Guest — Thu, 08 Dec 2011 02:28:00 +0000

Interesting idea. He wouldn’t be much older than Archer, if that.

By: Milojthatch

Milojthatch — Thu, 08 Dec 2011 01:40:00 +0000

Yes, Enterprise is about 100 years pre-TOS.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 07 Dec 2011 23:20:00 +0000

I don’t know my Trek timetables well, but are they about 100 years apart?