RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

TrekToday title image

Content filter

Want to find something specific?

Filter content by category

Filter content by date

Star Trek 2 In 2013

Posted by T'Bonz - 14/11/11 at 11:11 am


Share |

Fans hoping for Star Trek 2 in 2012 are in for a bit of a disappointment, as it’s more likely that the J.J. Abrams sequel will arrive in theaters in 2013 instead.

Viacom CEO Phillippe Dauman mentioned Star Trek 2 during a Viacom quarterly earnings call.  Abrams is “focused on developing the next installment of our Star Trek franchise” for a possible release in 2013, Dauman said.

Star Trek 2 had originally been slated to release on June 29, 2012.

Source: The Hollywood Reporter

Tags: ,

  • Jubber

    If waiting makes it better then I’m happy to wait till 2014 if I have to. I think they learned the lesson from pumping out too much junky trek for all those years. I want quality, not quantity.

  • Btflash55

    This isnt really news…… we all knew this months ago.

  • Auniqueone2b

    Yes, we know about these delays. Bottomline, with all the over thinking and over analyzing by Abrams and Paramount, they better hope this ends becoming like top 3 Trek movies of all time. The problem here, Paramount can do whatever they want, because they know fan base will never be indanger. Ugh! I hate movie politics.

  • B.

    The problem I’m afraid is that “quality” for the average moviegoer – who is a teenager – translates into sexy curves, lots of explosions, dumb and predictable dialogue and no human-beings-over-30-on-the-screen-please as if the universe was populated by people who spend too much time in the gym and not enough reading books… And please, keep it simple… Tss… Uhura is a dumb chick with a vulgar laugh with oral skills other than linguistic… Chekov is a total geek… Should we even talk about Scotty who is a parody of the Montgomery Scott that usually took command – and very seriously so – when Kirk and Spock were on away missions in the original series? I cannot expect much for ST2 – 12… I mean, these guys can write great stories (Fringe is great), but they are capable of the absolute worst (Transformers anyone?)… Lost has gone nowhere fast, and Super 8 lacked cohesion… Paramount will play it safe, and that mean an action-packed movie for people with an IQ of 95 who believe starships must maneuver in space like airplanes in the atmosphere… **sigh**

  • http://twitter.com/JediNews2010 Mark Newbold

    Got to ask, why on Vulcan are you referring to it as Star Trek 2? It’s ST12!

  • Ronkokk

    dont worry be happy

  • http://www.facebook.com/LightStryke Mark Casella II

    They haven’t numbered Trek movies since Star Trek VI. This is a whole new line of Trek movies. The Next Generation movies should’ve been called Star Trek The Next Generation – The Motion Picture, Star Trek The Next Generation II – First Contact, Star Trek: The Next Generation III – Insurrection, Star Trek: The Next Generation IV – Nemesis. It might have been better for business for those movies if they did that. These movies are a whole new line. Calling it Star Trek XII would just further confuse the people.

  • http://www.facebook.com/LightStryke Mark Casella II

    Dammit, Jim!! First The Man of Steel, now Star Trek II!