Comments on: Abrams Commits To Star Trek 2 http://www.trektoday.com/content/2011/09/abrams-commits-to-star-trek-2/ Daily Star Trek news Wed, 19 Jun 2013 23:58:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Anonymous http://www.trektoday.com/content/2011/09/abrams-commits-to-star-trek-2/comment-page-1/#comment-395 Anonymous Tue, 27 Sep 2011 03:13:00 +0000 http://www.trektoday.com/content/?p=12880#comment-395 I understand, sir. I main issue is seeing it labeled as "2"... it is quite obviously not number two. I understand, sir. I main issue is seeing it labeled as “2″… it is quite obviously not number two.

]]> By: KirkArcher http://www.trektoday.com/content/2011/09/abrams-commits-to-star-trek-2/comment-page-1/#comment-391 KirkArcher Sun, 25 Sep 2011 19:02:00 +0000 http://www.trektoday.com/content/?p=12880#comment-391 Also with VI didn't they stop numbering Also with VI didn’t they stop numbering

]]> By: KirkArcher http://www.trektoday.com/content/2011/09/abrams-commits-to-star-trek-2/comment-page-1/#comment-390 KirkArcher Sun, 25 Sep 2011 18:57:00 +0000 http://www.trektoday.com/content/?p=12880#comment-390 We are the amateurs that gave it a nnumber . Its a begining is why its has not a number . We are the amateurs that gave it a nnumber . Its a begining is why its has not a number .

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.trektoday.com/content/2011/09/abrams-commits-to-star-trek-2/comment-page-1/#comment-389 Anonymous Sun, 25 Sep 2011 17:00:00 +0000 http://www.trektoday.com/content/?p=12880#comment-389 Indeed. The title of "2" does not amuse me. To top that off, at Star Trek: The Exhibition, the new movie was referred to as "Star Trek"-- that's it. What happened to "XI"? It happens to be only thing that distinguishes which movie is in talks during conversation. I feel like we're working with amateurs. -Galassia Indeed.
The title of “2″ does not amuse me.

To top that off, at Star Trek: The Exhibition, the new movie was referred to as “Star Trek”– that’s it. What happened to “XI”? It happens to be only thing that distinguishes which movie is in talks during conversation.

I feel like we’re working with amateurs.

-Galassia

]]> By: PurpleTrekkie http://www.trektoday.com/content/2011/09/abrams-commits-to-star-trek-2/comment-page-1/#comment-346 PurpleTrekkie Sun, 18 Sep 2011 14:52:00 +0000 http://www.trektoday.com/content/?p=12880#comment-346 2..? wasn't the last one referred to as 11/XI ? 2..? wasn’t the last one referred to as 11/XI ?

]]> By: KirkArcher http://www.trektoday.com/content/2011/09/abrams-commits-to-star-trek-2/comment-page-1/#comment-340 KirkArcher Fri, 16 Sep 2011 18:25:00 +0000 http://www.trektoday.com/content/?p=12880#comment-340 Doubt their will be Fluidic Space this thme Doubt their will be Fluidic Space this thme

]]> By: KirkArcher http://www.trektoday.com/content/2011/09/abrams-commits-to-star-trek-2/comment-page-1/#comment-339 KirkArcher Fri, 16 Sep 2011 04:55:00 +0000 http://www.trektoday.com/content/?p=12880#comment-339 Warp speed engage kapla Warp speed engage kapla

]]> By: Spiral Media http://www.trektoday.com/content/2011/09/abrams-commits-to-star-trek-2/comment-page-1/#comment-338 Spiral Media Fri, 16 Sep 2011 02:14:00 +0000 http://www.trektoday.com/content/?p=12880#comment-338 maybe...just maybe...Captain Braxon of the timeship Aeon will set the record straight with the ACME Reset Time Box...? maybe…just maybe…Captain Braxon of the timeship Aeon will set the record straight with the ACME Reset Time Box…?

]]> By: Gauling http://www.trektoday.com/content/2011/09/abrams-commits-to-star-trek-2/comment-page-1/#comment-333 Gauling Thu, 15 Sep 2011 01:48:00 +0000 http://www.trektoday.com/content/?p=12880#comment-333 And lens flares. Don't forget the lens flares. And lens flares. Don’t forget the lens flares.

]]> By: Hopingforbetter http://www.trektoday.com/content/2011/09/abrams-commits-to-star-trek-2/comment-page-1/#comment-332 Hopingforbetter Wed, 14 Sep 2011 15:57:00 +0000 http://www.trektoday.com/content/?p=12880#comment-332 I wonder how many plot contrivances they'll be able to squeeze into this one? I wonder how many plot contrivances they’ll be able to squeeze into this one?

]]>