RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

TrekToday title image

Content filter

Want to find something specific?

Filter content by category

Filter content by date

Tag cloud

Abrams Bakula Bana Blu-Ray Burk Burton Cho Comic Comics contest Conventions Cumberbatch DVD Eve Frakes Greenwood IDW Publishing Kirk Koenig Kurtzman Lindelof Mulgrew Nichols Nimoy Orci Pegg Picardo Pine Quinto Retro Review Roddenberry Ryan Saldana Shatner Sirtis Spiner Spock Star Trek: Online Star Trek Magazine Stewart Takei Uhura Urban Wheaton Yelchin

Abrams Commits To Star Trek 2

Posted by T'Bonz - 13/09/11 at 07:09 pm


Share |

According to Vulture, J.J. Abrams will indeed be directing Star Trek 2.

“Insiders familiar with the director’s plans” told Vulture that pre-production on Star Trek 2 was underway; the script is set to be completed by the end of this month; and Star Trek 2 will begin shooting this winter.

Supposedly, part of the delay was due to the lack of availability of Alex Kurtzman, who had been working on Welcome to People. But now Kurtzman’s work on that project has been completed and he is ready to turn his attention to Star Trek 2.

Source: Vulture

Tags:

This entry was posted on Tuesday, September 13th, 2011 at 7:48 pm and is filed under Cast & Crew, Star Trek XII. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

  • Species 45879

    yawn

  • Hopingforbetter

    I wonder how many plot contrivances they’ll be able to squeeze into this one?

  • Gauling

    And lens flares. Don’t forget the lens flares.

  • http://www.trekzone.org Spiral Media

    maybe…just maybe…Captain Braxon of the timeship Aeon will set the record straight with the ACME Reset Time Box…?

  • KirkArcher

    Warp speed engage kapla

  • KirkArcher

    Doubt their will be Fluidic Space this thme

  • http://twitter.com/PurpleTrekkie PurpleTrekkie

    2..? wasn’t the last one referred to as 11/XI ?

  • Anonymous

    Indeed.
    The title of “2″ does not amuse me.

    To top that off, at Star Trek: The Exhibition, the new movie was referred to as “Star Trek”– that’s it. What happened to “XI”? It happens to be only thing that distinguishes which movie is in talks during conversation.

    I feel like we’re working with amateurs.

    -Galassia

  • KirkArcher

    We are the amateurs that gave it a nnumber . Its a begining is why its has not a number .

  • KirkArcher

    Also with VI didn’t they stop numbering

  • Anonymous

    I understand, sir. I main issue is seeing it labeled as “2″… it is quite obviously not number two.

«
»